I hate star ratings. They just seem so…unfair. And I don’t mean unfair for the thing being rated, but for
the rater.
Sometimes, I like stuff. Yes, just like it. I enjoyed it/it
worked fine/it was well-written, but I wasn’t overjoyed and pumping my fists in
the air saying, “Heck yeah, best sport score EVER!" (That's a thing sports people say, right?)
I don’t think three stars is a bad rating, because 3 stars
mean just that: I liked it. So with that in mind, let’s go on to Confess by Colleen Hoover. And to
this book, Ms. Hoover, I give a whole 3 stars. Because I liked it.
We’ve established what 3 stars mean now, right?
Good.
I really liked the premise of Confess, which involves the Dallas-based artist Owen creating
paintings based off of people’s confessions and deepest secrets while keeping
his own skeletons tucked neatly away in a closet.
And then there’s Auburn, who has a pretty big secret of her
own.
Things move quickly as Auburn and Owen are drawn to each
other, and every step of the book I felt that there had to be something more to pair’s together but not-together
relationship.
And I was correct. When I finally reached the end of the
book (*ahem* A whole 2 days later because I may or may not have wanted to put
it down until I figured out how those two were actually corrected…), everything
fell together more beautifully than I could have ever imagined.
So hey, if you enjoy liking things, check out Confess, it’s worth it.
Welcome back!!
ReplyDeleteI think the star system is flawed too - maybe out of 10 would be a bit better (or instead of stars perhaps chocolate bars or coffees?) It's almost become that 5* is 'I liked it' and everything lower is just worse. I got a 3* for one of my books, and a really nice review because the reviewer liked it.
I agree with you on that! Sometimes I even feel bad giving something 4 stars.
Delete